Choose Your AI Provider

Never get locked into a single AI provider. Switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, and others based on your needs, budget, and preferences—without losing your content setup or workflows.

Why Flexibility Matters

Most content tools lock you into one AI provider. This creates problems:

  • Cost bloat: Prices rise, you're stuck paying more for the same capabilities
  • Limited options: One provider might be best for research, another for writing
  • Dependency risk: Your content pipeline breaks if your provider has issues
  • No switching: Migrating to a new tool means rebuilding everything

How Wordflows Handles This

1. Provider-Agnostic Architecture

Wordflows is built with a modular architecture that abstracts the underlying AI provider. Your content brain, briefs, outlines, and all configuration stay exactly the same when you swap providers.

2. Mix and Match on Each Step

Use different providers for different steps in your workflow. For example: Google Gemini for research (great SERP access), OpenAI GPT-4 for writing (nuanced output), and a cheaper model for optimization. You save money while optimizing quality per step.

3. Simple Provider Switching

Change your AI provider configuration in seconds. No data loss. No rebuilding briefs or outlines. Just pick a new provider and your next content generation runs with it.

4. Transparent Pricing & Performance

Wordflows shows you the cost and performance metrics for each provider so you can make informed decisions about which works best for your budget and quality needs.

Supported AI Providers

OpenAI

Industry-leading language models with GPT-4 for nuanced, high-quality writing.

Best for: Writing, refinement, nuanced reasoning

Anthropic (Claude)

Strong at long-form reasoning and following detailed instructions precisely.

Best for: Complex outlines, fact-checking, strategy

Google Gemini

Excellent SERP access and real-time search integration for research phases.

Best for: Research, SERP analysis, current events

Mistral & Others

Access to emerging models and cost-effective alternatives for optimization phases.

Best for: Budget optimization, experimentation

Real Scenarios

Scenario 1: Cost Optimization

Use Google Gemini for research ($0.075/1M input tokens), OpenAI for writing ($0.03/1K output tokens), and Mistral for optimization ($0.0014/1K tokens). Total cost per article: 70% cheaper than using GPT-4 for every step.

Scenario 2: Quality Focus

Use Claude for strategic outlines (best at complex reasoning), GPT-4 for the main draft (most natural tone), and Claude again for fact-checking. Best-in-class quality at each step.

Scenario 3: Provider Risk Mitigation

OpenAI rate limits spike during peak hours? Switch to Claude mid-workflow without losing your content pipeline. Your brand voice, briefs, and outlines remain intact.

Why This Matters

  • Control costs: Optimize spend per workflow step
  • Optimize quality: Use the best tool for each job
  • Reduce risk: No single point of failure
  • Future-proof: New models launch constantly—stay flexible
  • Own your setup: Never locked in—always free to migrate

Take control of your AI strategy

Stop overpaying. Stop getting locked in. Start optimizing every step of your content pipeline.